WNBA Expansion Rolls On—But Sophie Cunningham’s Comments Draw Backlash
The WNBA is riding a wave of momentum as it rapidly cements itself as the fastest-growing professional sports league in the United States. That growth surged forward again on Monday, with the league unveiling three new expansion franchises—signaling its most ambitious era yet.
Following the already announced additions of the Golden State Valkyries (set to begin play in 2025) and the Toronto Tempo alongside a yet-to-be-named Portland franchise in 2026, the league revealed its next steps: new teams in Cleveland, Detroit, and Philadelphia are slated to join the WNBA ranks in 2028, 2029, and 2030, respectively. These cities reportedly paid a record-breaking $250 million expansion fee each to enter the league—underscoring just how hot a commodity the WNBA has become.
However, while fans and media largely praised the league’s aggressive expansion efforts, not everyone inside the WNBA shared the same enthusiasm. Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham voiced skepticism—and ignited controversy in the process.
In comments to Yahoo Sports, Cunningham questioned whether the selected expansion cities reflect the desires of WNBA players themselves.
“I also think that you want to listen to your players, too,” she said. “Where do they want to play? Where are they going to get excited to play?”
Her remarks took a more pointed turn when she added:
“I don’t know how excited people are to be going to Detroit or Cincinnati.”
The problem? Cincinnati isn’t even one of the cities being added—Cleveland is. And Cunningham’s dismissive tone toward key markets has sparked criticism across the basketball world.
The irony isn’t lost on observers: Cunningham plays in Indiana, a state not exactly famed for its cosmopolitan nightlife or national draw (despite its rich basketball roots). So calling out cities like Detroit and Cleveland—both of which have passionate, long-standing hoops communities—comes off as tone-deaf, particularly at a time when unity and growth are paramount for the league.
Critics quickly pointed out the historical significance of Detroit in WNBA lore. The Detroit Shock, who played from 1998 to 2009 before relocating to Tulsa and eventually becoming the Dallas Wings, were one of the league’s most decorated franchises. Their fan base was fervent, and their impact on the sport undeniable.
Cunningham’s comments also feel misaligned with the current spirit of expansion and opportunity. Caitlin Clark, Cunningham’s high-profile Indiana Fever teammate and one of the most visible players in the sport, has expressed excitement about cities like Cleveland embracing women’s basketball.
At a time when the WNBA is seeing unprecedented growth, increased media coverage, and surging attendance numbers, it’s essential that players use their platforms to uplift the movement—not cast doubt on it. Cunningham, who has gained significantly more attention since joining the Fever’s Clark-powered roster, had an opportunity to celebrate the league’s forward momentum. Instead, she found herself overshadowing the good news with unnecessary controversy.
It wouldn’t be surprising if WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert picked up the phone for a candid conversation with Cunningham. The league has worked hard to build consensus and excitement around expansion. Comments like Cunningham’s don’t just distract—they risk undermining the very progress the WNBA has fought to achieve.
In a pivotal moment for the future of women’s professional basketball, the message from the league and its fans is clear: this is a time for support, unity, and vision—not dismissiveness. The WNBA is rising. Everyone in the game should be lifting with it.
Leave a Reply