The ending to the Phillies-Mets series definitely left a sour taste in Philadelphia’s mouth — and Rob Thomson’s pointed comments made that crystal clear.
In a pivotal extra-innings moment, Edwin Díaz appeared to toe the line — if not cross it — with his three disengagements during J.T. Realmuto’s at-bat. Under MLB rules, a pitcher is only allowed two step-offs or pickoff attempts per plate appearance with a runner on base. The third results in a balk (or in this case, a base awarded). That’s exactly what happened… until the umpires were told Díaz was injured, and they reversed the call.
Thomson’s reaction was borderline sarcastic, and understandably so. His quote — suggesting teams might start mimicking the move if it’s a loophole — was a not-so-subtle jab at what he likely believes was gamesmanship disguised as a medical concern.
“Step off a third time, it’s a big part of the game, calls the trainer out. We’ll take you out, we’ll put somebody else in.”
That comment is dripping with frustration and irony. If Díaz wasn’t injured after the first or second step-off, why did it suddenly happen after the third — when the disengagement rule would’ve cost the Mets the go-ahead run?
Why This Moment Matters
In isolation, this might look like minor gamesmanship. But when a series sweep is on the line — and possibly a key NL East tiebreaker — these moments matter immensely. The NL East is shaping up to be razor-tight again in 2025, and head-to-head matchups often play a crucial role in seeding and wild card spots. This game could loom large in September or even October.
What’s Next?
Expect this incident to be remembered. Not just by Thomson — who seemed keen to use it as a strategic lesson — but likely by the league as well. If other managers see the Díaz situation as an exploitable loophole, MLB might need to step in with rule clarifications.
And when the Phillies and Mets meet again? There’s definitely going to be a little extra juice.
Would you like a breakdown of the disengagement rule and how this situation could impact future games or strategy?
Leave a Reply