Strengthening the Bronx’s Late-Inning Relief as the Trade Deadline Nears
With the Major League Baseball trade deadline barreling toward late July, the New York Yankees find themselves at a critical juncture: their bullpen remains a glaring weakness, specifically in the ninth inning. Championship-contending teams invariably lean on a dependable closer to seal victories, and for the Yankees, that reliable figure remains elusive.
Closer Role: A Cornerstone of Championship Teams
Oakland A’s general manager, Billy Beane, once said of relief pitching that it can be the difference between winning and falling short. Now, the Yankees are discovering that firsthand. In 2025, the Bronx Bombers have stumbled late in games far too often. Their closer role—critical to preserving one- or two-run leads—has produced more doubts than certainties. With the deadline approaching, the Yankees face mounting pressure to fortify that ninth-inning anchor.
Devin Williams: High-Profile Acquisition, Low-Profile Results
Over the past offseason, New York swung a notable deal to address the vacancy. In December, they acquired Devin Williams from the Milwaukee Brewers, hoping his dominant stuff would translate to dominant outcomes in pinches. But while Williams brings a fierce arsenal—marked fastballs and a high-spin slider—his results have fallen short. Though there have been flashes of brilliance, his overall performance hasn’t matched the hefty expectations that came with his acquisition. And for a bullpen that lacked consistency, that’s a problem Yankees general manager Brian Cashman can’t ignore.
Luke Weaver: Set-Up Specialist or Closer in Disguise?
Amid the closer-driven chaos, Luke Weaver has cropped up with strong outings. Though not labeled as their ninth-inning man, Weaver’s grasp on high-leverage situations has been impressive. His velocity and strikeout ability have fueled speculation: could he transition into the closer’s role effectively?
Not everyone is convinced. Weaver, some argue, excels best as a setup pitcher—someone who can navigate through the high-pressure eighth inning, bridging the gap between the starter and closer. His current success hints that he may remain most valuable in that capacity. If he proves consistently reliable before the ninth, Weaver could become a trade chip, or at the very least, a linchpin in reorganizing how New York manages its late-game arms.
Enter Ryan Helsley: A Top-Tier Option
If the Yankees decide to pursue external reinforcement rather than shuffle current pieces, one name leaps to the forefront: Ryan Helsley of the St. Louis Cardinals.
Helsley stands among the elite relievers in baseball today. He’s a high-leverage asset with a fastball-slider combination that demolishes late-inning hitters. In 2024, he led all of MLB with 49 saves, earning him the National League Reliever of the Year award. Now, at age 30, he’s carrying that excellence forward. Through the first half of the 2025 season, he’s continued to dominate, further cementing his reputation as a lights-out option in close games.
Cardinals’ Dilemma: Going for It or Cashing In?
But landing Helsley won’t be simple. Whether St. Louis decides to sell or stay put is the linchpin in this scenario.
As of mid-June, the Cardinals sit at 40–35, hovering in a playoff spot. Their competitive status complicates things: are they truly buyers, looking to add pieces and chase a postseason berth? Or do they see Helsley as a peak asset whose value might never be higher, thus entertaining rental offers at the deadline?
MLB analysts—including New York Post’s Jon Heyman—view Helsley as St. Louis’s top trade chip if they pivot toward selling . But that’s a heavy “if.” A playoff-hopeful Cardinals team may balk at trading away its elite late-inning guy.
What Stands Between New York and a Closer Upgrade?
If the Cardinals lean toward selling, the Yankees must prepare an enticing package. Helsley’s dominant presence makes him pricey—as does the fact that he’s signed only through the end of the 2025 season. In essence, New York would be acquiring a rental closer: high reward, short term.
To acquire him, the Yankees could offer a bundle: mid-to-high-level minor-league pitching and/or position-player prospects. With Helsley’s contract expiring, though, Cardinals may sense leverage. They could demand more, knowing they hold both a high-performing closer and deadline momentum.
Still, for the Yankees, the potential payoff could justify the price. A takeover of the ninth inning might catalyze deeper postseason success. And if MLB trade-market trends hold, movable elite relievers like Helsley might only be available once per season—others typically parlay such arms in offseasons, not in-deadline rentals.
Deadline Strategies and Yankees’ Urgency
GM Brian Cashman faces competing priorities:
1. Internal upgrade: Keep faith in Devin Williams and experiment with Luke Weaver, potentially shifting bullpen roles. Could this suffice?
2. External acquisition: Chase after Helsley or another premier closer at deadline cost.
Baseball executives must balance current performance against future upside. While Williams and Weaver give internal options, their inconsistency carries risk—especially if the AL East tightens. A tumultuous season for the Rangers and Blue Jays could crack open the division late, but only if the Yankees can reliably shut games down.
Risk Versus Reward: The Closer Question
So what’s at stake?
Upside: Helsley arrives and thrives. New York firms its hold on close games, secures that last half-inning, and enters October with broader momentum.
Costs: Hicks to prospects, relinquished farm strength. If Bok or Hall (“future prospects”) don’t pan out, the organization could regret short-term urgency.
Alternatives: If Cashman stands firm, betting on Williams and Weaver, there’s flexibility—meaning no prospects lost, but a risk of bullpen vulnerability late.
Laboring Under “Selling” Versus “Buying” Headlines
Trade chatter underscores three dynamics:
Yankees’ self-assessment: After middling-to-brisk offensive and rotation performances, a leaky bullpen becomes glaring—as teams prepare for late July, experts observe the closer role as missing this season.
Cardinals’ posture: Winning below .500? They might sell. Leading or pushing for postseason? They hold patience. Either path sways Helsley’s availability.
Market dynamics: Rentable elite closers are rare mid-season. Phillies, Cubs, White Sox? They rarely trade top relievers midway—understandably, late game arms can swing close games.
The Timing Crunch
Time is of the essence. When MLB’s trade deadline passes—typically July 31—the Yankees will have lost the opportunity to act, either buying or walking away. By mid-July, as waiver wires thin and buzz materializes, moves worth making may no longer be available.
For Cashman and his front office staff, the decision is now: make a sweeping move for Helsley—or double down on their current bullpen strategy (Williams + Weaver + potential external “bridge” arms via low-cost trades or claims).
Scenario One: Helsley Heads to the Bullpen
Immediate benefit: A proven closer solves the ninth inning issue. Williams transitions to setup, Weaver primes the eighth, and Yankees gain comfort.
Investment payment: Suppose NY sends, e.g., two mid- to high-rotation prospects and possibly a lottery-ticket pitching arm. The cost seems steep—but locks down close games.
Risk: Helsley may walk in free agency post-2025. Then the organization spent prospects for short-term gain. But if the team returns to the World Series, might be worth it.
Scenario Two: Internal Fixes Plus Tweaks
Status quo: Keep Williams as closer. Use Weaver in setup. Seek external reclamation project relievers or specialists in low-cost offers. Still leave door open to pre-deadline move.
Pros: No prospect depletion. Maintains organizational depth.
Cons: Williams may not settle. Weaver might not adapt to ninth. Yankees risk late high-leverage losses piling up.
What Analysts Are Saying
Jon Heyman of the New York Post flagged Helsley as the Cardinals’ premier trade chip if they sell . Baseball insiders echo caution: St. Louis might pursue wild-card contention, but Helsley represents their best chance to catalyze or profit. If he’s traded, they’ll demand top-tier prospects—perhaps requiring three-to-four pieces in exchange.
Likewise, scouts suggest Helsley’s velocity—sitting in the mid-90s with plus-spin slider—is unmatched among available veterans. He’s the kind of reliever GMs skim off waiver wires only when desperate. For New York, paying big may not be extravagant—it may be essential.
Summary & Outlook
A playoff-caliber bullpen leans on reliable late-inning arms. The Yankees’ performance through June reveals a patchwork approach: Williams hasn’t secured the role, Weaver hasn’t (yet) converted to closer, and the rest of the relief corps remains inconsistent.
Facing a flagging division race, Cashman has two paths:
1. Aggressive approach: Acquire Helsley at deadline cost. Concentrate salary and depth on immediate title push.
2. Conservative approach: Rely on internal arms, add depth via claims and lower compensation trades. Maintain farm system intact—betting on bounce backs.
The decision may come down to whether St. Louis decides to explore the trade market. If Helsley hits the wire, New York must act fast.
Why It Matters
Closer roles win championships: A sharp ninth inning shuts down opponents when games are tight. The Yankees once had Mariano Rivera—now seek someone to replicate that shutdown ability.
Deadline timing: The July trade deadline has loomed for months; as it approaches, available talent shrinks.
Division pressure: The AL East remains treacherous. Boston, Tampa, and Toronto lurk. New York’s ability to hold leads late could define their entire 2025 destiny.
Final Take
As July approaches, the Yankees stand at a crossroads. Their ninth-inning void remains a glaring flaw. They can push forward with internal pieces or roll the dice on a package centered on Ryan Helsley, a dominant closer under contract only through the end of the season.
If they pull the trigger, it shows a confidence in their championship chances. If they pass, it signals either satisfaction in internal development or prudence around resource allocation.
Ultimately, the choice falls to Brian Cashman: act boldly—and risk future depth for immediate bullpen dominance—or stay conservative and hope internal fixes suffice.
Leave a Reply